|
|||||
|
In the New York Times. “These new disclosures appear to contradict your assertions that you were not informed about the Halliburton contracts,” Mr. Waxman, Democrat of California, wrote. “They also seem to contradict the administration’s repeated assertions that political appointees were not involved in the award of the contracts to Halliburton.” VERY good article at this obscure blog. Story for Monday here. A real attempt at trying to show what the hell went on at Guantanamo. This article is a bid for a journalism award, really. A major feature. Associated Press. According to the San Francisco Chronicle. Thanks to rant-o-rama reader Danny for this one: Document release imminent says the Telegraph. Also, the ICRC has warned the US that it would be illegal to hold Saddam Hussein past June 30th unless he’s charged with a crime. This is in the Guardian UK. Every time someone tries to say to you that John Kerry was wrong or even a “flip flopper” to oppose the Vietnam war, make them read this. And then consider that these crimes have been banned by Army regulation for decades, yet suddenly were reinstated, we now know, over the objection of top Army lawyers. […] Just in case we forget the details, good articles here and also here in the same publication about how it was done. Note the deep involvement of Donald Rumsfeld himself, meeting with Hussein personally to reassure him that it was OK for Iraq to use chemical weapons (the New York Times also reported on this […] AP Breaking News type story, we’ll see what this looks like in the am |
|||||
|
Copyright © 2026 narus.info PRISM/US-984XN - All Rights Reserved Powered by WordPress & Atahualpa |
|||||