This is one of the most bizarre and unbelievable major news stories I’ve ever seen. Who gets shot when they are “about to” confess to murder? What else was he “about to” confess to, according to these mind reading secret sources? 9/11 involvement? Oklahoma City bombing? Texas fertilizer explosion? Who confesses to murder when they are in their own home, not a police station? Was this suspect Mirandized before he was killed?
Yes, of course, Alex Jones went that far. Remember, he is treated as a serious mainstream news source and monthly more and more of his garbage is inserted into the mainstream news as something plausible and debatable. This is the same guy who said that a government missile exploded the fertilizer plant in West, Texas when it was already burning out of control.
They were fictionalized, and all the changes were to harm Clinton and Obama, CBS reports, exactly as I analyzed earlier. Apparently GOP staff members are to blame. This is literally a frame-up and I am sure it is illegal to fraudulently forge government documents. Jonathan Karl of ABC knows exactly who did this and not only is he not revealing who committed these felony crimes, he also refuses to admit he has done anything wrong journalistically.
Notice in the actual television report, Jonathan Karl says “I have obtained” e-mails that say x, y and z things that make Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama look bad. He was lying, he had not obtained the e-mails written by the White House. As you can see in the previous post, the e-mails don’t say those things Karl claimed were in them that make Clinton and Obama look bad. When CBS News and Dan Rather ran a story on Texas Air National Guard documents that were apparently forged, they at least were showing the forgeries (handed to them by a source) on the screen. ABC, in this instance, is showing forgeries that they created themselves. Those aren’t printouts of e-mails in the screenshot above; someone at ABC typed those documents manually, then they were shown on your screen in order to fool you into thinking you were looking at printouts of White House e-mails. They’re forgeries created by ABC. There are two steps of deception here, someone fabricated false passages before “reading’ the e-mails” (actually their self-serving, fictitious White House e-mails) to ABC, and then ABC, who absolutely knew it was shaky to rely on some midnight phone call, faked up paper documents to make it appear they had obtained them electronically. What you saw on the screen were forgeries, intentionally created to fool you into believing a false story was credible.
I used to think that “he said, she said,” when it became the norm, was the worst possible form of reporting. Now we have something worse. Now at ABC, “he said that she said” is good enough for them to call it the gospel truth and commit forgery to bolster what they know is already weak stuff.
Having Jake Tapper catch you running a false story to help lying politicians is like having O.J. Simpson prove to the world you’re a wife-beater.
CNN gets a story right for once (handed to them, but nonetheless). The fabrications were specifically designed to smear Hillary Clinton, and now ABC and the Weekly Standard have been exposed as running a fabricated story from a GOP Congressional source.