Was the rather obvious implication contained in New York Times editorial by the editors (the left-hand page):
Until this week, the administration had deflected attention onto journalists by producing documents that officials had been compelled to sign to supposedly waive any promise of confidentiality. Our colleague Judith Miller, unjustly jailed for protecting the identity of confidential sources, was right to view these so-called waivers as meaningless.
Mr. Rove could clear all this up quickly. All he has to do is call a press conference and tell everyone what conversations he had and with whom. While we like government officials who are willing to whisper vital information, we like even more government officials who tell the truth in public.
The editors are telegraphing it plain as day: there may be others as well, but the source that Miller refuses to name, that Fitzgerald demands she testify about, is Karl Rove.
Leave a Reply