Speaks for itself. This isn’t the first time he has used the “smart people don’t like me and are picking on me” angle.
|
|||||
|
Speaks for itself. This isn’t the first time he has used the “smart people don’t like me and are picking on me” angle. Here is the first version of the story, pulled down by the New York Times since and revised, which originally included this passage:
This was removed from the first version of the story and is not in the second, current version. Let’s look at the incredible difference between that statement from the former Bush administration official and that of the current President, Barack Obama:
Why did the New York Times remove the Bush official’s quote? Here is an update on the differences and the New York Times’ defense of their actions. There is gunfire right now and protesters are inside the compound. Like Mitt Romney and the US Embassy in Cairo, they condemn a certain film. Ryan obviously wants to run for President in 2016. Mitt Romney is now so finished as a Presidential candidate, his running mate is even trying to back away from him. If this continues it will be noticed by the media. Who is behind this so-called movie? I have now seen the (banned from YouTube) trailer and it shows nonstop dubbing job on a film that would be comical in a different situation, full of one hateful scene after another, designed to insult and anger any thinking person. “Muhammad” has his face jammed into a woman’s crotch; he is called a child molester. The entire thing was intended to provoke a violent response, and now it has. It is hard to express how disgusting this timeline is. Here is a detail of what happened in Libya, where the attack seems to have been the work of Al Qaeda taking revenge for the US killing of their second in command in June 2012. Dan Senor, the chief Bush apologist in Iraq from circa 2007, was behind Romney’s strategy on September 11th and 12th. On September 11, 2012, after hours of calculation, the Romney campaign broke a pledge against campaigning designed to honor the victims of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, and the reason they did this was to take advantage of the death of State Department officer Sean Smith in Libya. This attack was based on lies from the very beginning, and the head of the Republican National Committee was involved. The US Embassy in Cairo had to defend itself from a scurrilous political attack based on lies from Mitt Romney at the same time a mob was breaching its walls outside. Look at the expression on Mitt Romney’s face as he ended an impromptu news conference to lie and lie again to exploit the deaths of four Americans. I can’t recommend this editorial enough as reading on this incident.
UPDATE: The coordinated military style attack against the US consulate in Benghazi lasted 4 hours and involved the use of heavy artillery. This is disgraceful and should disqualify him from being the President of the United States. He is making a political attack to exploit an attack where four Americans were killed, and it’s based on a lie. He is trying to make people believe the US Embassy in Cairo denounced the film after a mob attacked there. He continues to insist that the statement made yesterday by the Embassy (denouncing the hateful anti-Muslim film, and designed to defuse the potential of physical attacks) came from the White House, when Washington has explicitly said that the Embassy made the statement ad hoc and on their own. I’ve got news for you, Mitt Romney. Of course the President of the United States stands by his ambassador, even when they say something unanticipated that can be twisted out of context only after Americans are killed by mob violence the statement was designed to prevent. It is what it is, people. Apparently the Romney organization wants us to back the neocon filmmaker who intentionally provoked the protests. The US Embassy in Cairo actually had to spend time defending against Romney’s attacks at the same time a mob was trying to get inside. Condemning a United States Embassy hours before it is besieged by a violent mob is political and diplomatic suicide. A reporter has now seen many more PDBs than just the one read to Bush on August 6th, 2001. Bush knew. To the degree that any President, or anyone who can read a memo can know, Bush knew. This is quite significant, and the beginning signs of a major victory in November. |
|||||
|
Copyright © 2026 narus.info PRISM/US-984XN - All Rights Reserved Powered by WordPress & Atahualpa |
|||||